PylonMon
Uptime monitoring

A more powerful
Uptime Kuma alternative.

Everything you love about simple monitoring, with more reliability, more integrations, and no self-hosting.

  • ✓No servers to maintain
  • ✓More monitor types (HTTP, TCP, DNS, etc.)
  • ✓Global monitoring locations
  • ✓Beautiful alerts and status pages
  • ✓Team collaboration & reporting
Simple, but more powerful.
Monitors
NameTypeStatusUptime (30d)
WebsiteHTTPUp99.99%
APIHTTPUp99.98%
DatabaseTCPUp99.95%
DNSDNSUp99.99%
Cron jobHeartbeatUp99.97%
Buddy, the PylonMon mascot
Works well with
VercelDockerAWSDigitalOceanCloudflareGitHub

The structural problem no self-hosted monitor can fix

It isn't a knock on Kuma — it's true of anything that monitors from inside your own failure domain, ours included. If the hypervisor dies, the UPS runs out, or your ISP drops at 3am, the monitor that would have told you is part of the outage. A watchdog can't live on the thing it watches. We wrote up the full argument here.

Two honest ways to use PylonMon

OPTION A · PAIR

Keep Kuma, add the outside layer

Point a PylonMon HTTP check at your Kuma instance and a heartbeat at the host it runs on. Kuma keeps watching your LAN in detail; we page you when Kuma itself — or the box, or the whole site — goes quiet. The free tier covers this completely.

OPTION B · REPLACE

Hosted, nothing to run

HTTP/S, TCP, ping, DNS, TLS-cert and heartbeat monitors from our infrastructure, alerts to Discord, Slack, Telegram, ntfy, email, webhooks — and SMS & voice calls on paid tiers. No container to update, no SQLite to back up, no reverse proxy to expose.

EITHER WAY

Servers too, not just URLs

A tiny open-source agent (MIT) reports CPU, memory and per-mount disk — and if a machine goes quiet, that silence is itself the alert. Three servers free.

Uptime Kuma vs PylonMon, honestly

Uptime KumaPylonMon
Runs onYour hardware, inside your networkOur infrastructure, outside it
Survives your outageNo — it IS part of the outageYes — that's the point
CostFree, unlimited monitorsFree for 20 monitors; paid from $9/mo
MaintenanceUpdates, backups, the host itselfNone — it's hosted
LAN-internal checksExcellent — it lives thereVia the agent & heartbeats
SMS / voice-call pagingVia third-party services you wire upBuilt in on paid tiers
Probing private LAN IPsYes — it lives thereLocal probes via the beacon agent

If self-hosting everything is the goal, keep Kuma — sincerely. This page exists for the day you realize nobody is watching the watcher.

Common questions

Can PylonMon monitor things inside my LAN?

Not by polling — we're outside your network by design, and a private IP is unreachable from the internet. Instead: put a heartbeat on internal jobs (they check in outward), or the beacon agent on internal machines (it pushes vitals out). Silence from either pages you.

Do I have to stop using Kuma?

No — the pairing works well: Kuma for LAN detail, PylonMon as the off-site dead-man's-switch over Kuma, its host, and everything public. But you don't need both to be covered — between hosted monitors, heartbeats, the agent, and local probes via the beacon, PylonMon can fully replace it.

What does it cost?

Free forever for 20 monitors, 1-minute intervals, heartbeat + HTTP/S + TCP + ping, and 3 agent-monitored servers. Paid tiers start at $9/mo for 30-second intervals, more monitors, SMS & voice, and extra monitor types. See pricing →

Put a watchdog outside your network →

Free for 20 monitors. Two-minute setup. Kuma can stay.